@article {183,
	title = {Embryonic cell lineage of the marine nematode Pellioditis marina},
	journal = {Developmental BiologyDevelopmental Biology},
	volume = {258},
	number = {1},
	year = {2003},
	note = {Houthoofd, W Jacobsen, K Mertens, C Vangestel, S Coomans, A Borgonie, G},
	month = {Jun},
	pages = {57-69},
	abstract = {We describe the complete embryonic cell lineage of the marine nematode Pellioditis marina (Rhabditidae) up to somatic muscle contraction, resulting in the formation of 638 cells, of which 67 undergo programmed cell death. In comparison with Caenorhabditis elegans, the overall lineage homology is 95.5\%; fate homology, however, is only 76.4\%. The majority of the differences in fate homology concern nervous, epidermal, and pharyngeal tissues. Gut and, remarkably, somatic muscle is highly conserved in number and position. Partial lineage data from the slower developing Halicephalobus sp. (Panagrolaimidae) reveal a lineage largely, but not exclusively, built up of monoclonal sublineage blocs with identical fates, unlike the polyclonal fate distribution in C elegans and P. marina. The fate distribution pattern in a cell lineage could be a compromise between minimizing the number of specification events by monoclonal specification and minimizing the need for migrations by forming the cells close at their final position. The latter could contribute to a faster embryonic development. These results reveal that there is more than one way to build a nematode. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.},
	isbn = {0012-1606},
	author = {Houthoofd, W. and Jacobsen, K. and Mertens, C. and Vangestel, S. and Coomans, A. and Borgonie, G.}
}
@article {153,
	title = {Different roads to form the same gut in nematodes},
	journal = {Evolution \& DevelopmentEvolution \& Development},
	volume = {8},
	number = {4},
	year = {2006},
	note = {Times Cited: 1 Article English Borgonie, G Univ Ghent, Dept Biol, KL Ledeganckstr 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium Cited References Count: 40 058HC BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 9600 GARSINGTON RD, OXFORD OX4 2DQ, OXON, ENGLAND OXFORD},
	pages = {362-369},
	abstract = {The morphogenesis of a gut from the endoderm has been well studied among the animal kingdom and is also well described in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. But are there other ways to build a nematode intestine? Sulston et al. (1983) described a different intestinal cell lineage in the species Panagrellus redivivus and Turbatrix aceti that includes two programmed cell deaths. However, no details are known about the three-dimensional (3D) configuration and the role of the cell deaths. Here, we describe the intestinal morphogenesis of P. redivivus and five other nematode species by means of four-dimensional microscopy, which gives us a 3D representation of gut formation at the cellular level. The morphological pathway of gut formation is highly conserved among these distantly related species. However, we found the P. redivivus pattern in another related species Halicephalobus gingivalis. In this pattern, the intestinal precursors migrate inward in concert with the mesoderm precursors. Based on the observations, we propose a hypothesis that could explain the differences. The positions of the mesoderm precursors create a possible spatial constraint, by which the establishment of bilateral symmetry in the intestine is delayed. This symmetry is corrected by cell migrations; other cells are eliminated and compensated by supplementary cell divisions. This pattern leads to the same result as in the other nematodes: a bilateral symmetrical intestine with nine rings. This illustrates how conserved body plans can be achieved by different developmental mechanisms},
	keywords = {C-ELEGANS, Caenorhabditis, Caenorhabditis elegans, caenorhabditis-elegans, CELLS, EMBRYOGENESIS, EMBRYONIC-CELL LINEAGE, Evolution, FATE, INDUCTION, microscopy, MODEL, NEMATODE, nematodes, SPECIFICATION},
	isbn = {1520-541X},
	author = {Houthoofd, W. and Willems, M. and Vangestel, S. and Mertens, C. and Bert, W. and Borgonie, G.}
}
